News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 'Just round one' on Newell Highway: NRMA 

'Just round one' on Newell Highway: NRMA

07 Nov, 2009 03:00 AM
The people who are “speed obsessed” within the NSW Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA) may be looking to slow down traffic on other highways apart from the Newell, the NRMA is warning.

Amid a “total uproar” over the slashing of the Newell Highway’s maximum speed limit from 110 to 100km/h, NRMA director for western NSW Graham Blight said “this will just be the first one”.

Asked if he could be right, a spokesperson for the RTA yesterday referred the Daily Liberal to the final paragraph in a statement issued late on Thursday announcing that from December 1 motorists on the Newell must stay under 100km/h.

“The RTA regularly monitors and reviews speed limits in accordance with RTA speed zoning guidelines,” it read.

In response to a specific inquiry about the Mitchell Highway, that carries a maximum speed limit of 110km/h on either side of Dubbo, the spokesperson said “we don’t have any current proposal” to alter its speed limit.

The RTA’s sudden announcement on the Newell has angered communities, politicians and organisations such as the NRMA which has refused to surrender in the battle for public consultation.

Earlier this week it encouraged people living on and near the Newell to sign petitions seeking a say on the RTA’s plan to reduce the speed limit.

Mr Blight yesterday reported that signatures were piling up and they would be presented to the State Parliament despite the RTA’s announcement.

He is scathing of its “sneaky” behaviour on Thursday morning after the NRMA heard rumours of new road signs and asked unsuccessfully for clarification.

“Instead of the brush-off, they should have come out and been honest,” Mr Blight said.

The director says the RTA argument that lower speeds will save lives “defies logic” based on the significant role fatigue plays in crashes.

His call for “empirical evidence” from the RTA to support its decision was yesterday met with a one-off example relating to a section of the Greater Western Highway between Lithgow and Bathurst.

The RTA spokesperson said about 10 years ago its limit was reduced from 110 to 100km/h resulting in a “25 per cent reduction in casualty crashes”.

Mr Blight says the “clandestine” RTA has to do more to prove its point and has called for a halt to the introduction of the 100km/h limit next month.

“The RTA should stop it and come out and have some consultation,”he said.

“If they can’t convince us, they should show some respect for community views.”

Users of the Newell have long complained about its lack of overtaking lanes.

“Only 9 per cent of the highway has passing lanes,” said Mr Blight who worries how motorists will react if stuck behind a semi-trailer that slows down and speeds up depending on terrain.

The RTA claims a common speed limit for most traffic on the Newell will “reduce the need for overtaking”.

Mr Blight says it “could well be” that reducing the speed limit is seen as a cheaper option than building passing lanes.

“Sign the petition,” he urged western NSW residents.

“This is just round one.”

kim.bartley@ruralpress.co m

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
During holidays, people travel between Melbourne & Brisbane. A lot of people stop at Dubbo for the night. Unfortunately a lot don't quite make it. Therefore we have a lot of fatallities North & South of Dubbo. So! if we can make the road safer somehow, we should try it. Dropping the speed limit a little just may save some lives. It is only 10 klms over an hour. Isn't it worth it? It will take years to put in passing lanes. We need to save lives now!
Posted by bev, 7/11/2009 10:22:16 AM, on Dubbo Daily Liberal
How can the NRMA claim that reducing the speed limit won't save lives when in their own Open Road Magazine (A Sign of the Times by Alan Finlay) it states: "while speeding may not necessarily be the 'primary cause' of all crashes, there's little doubt that excessive speed will increase the likelihood of a crash and make the outcome of any crash worse. It comes back to basic physics." ????
Posted by col, 7/11/2009 2:40:49 PM, on Dubbo Daily Liberal
If you hit a tree or another car at 100kph or 110kph, I can't see any difference at all. Lowering speed limit is only going to help out the State Government's Revenue. So I suppose there is one good outcome of this. 100kph is slow, you tend to fall asleep, as in 110kph at least it is a bit realistic and will tend to keep you alert. Maybe cut out impatient overtaking, people need to get out on the highways more and see what goes on when people take risks over taking cars, considering this is happening at speeds lower then 100kph, I can't really lowering the speed limit making a real difference.
Posted by Jim, 9/11/2009 9:26:02 AM, on Dubbo Daily Liberal

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles

1) Apple iPhone 4 32GB44 plans 12%
2) Apple iPhone 4 16GB44 plans 6%
3) HTC Desire4 plans 2%
4) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB33 plans 2%
5) Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro37 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press

Buy Local


Daily Liberal







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...