News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 DCDC wins six-month ‘stopgap’ contract from council 

DCDC wins six-month ‘stopgap’ contract from council

07 Nov, 2009 03:00 AM
Dubbo City Council will place its precious baby of economic development into the arms of the Dubbo City Development Corporation (DCDC) for six months, while it goes to work to decide its permanent approach to the vital responsibility.

The matter was decided in an extraordinary meeting of the council last night that was called to consider a rescission motion against a decision made on Monday night.

Councillors Tina Reynolds, Ben Shields and Ann Barnard were the authors of the rescission motion, but they came nowhere near attracting the numbers, meaning the council will enter into a six-month contract with the DCDC for the provision of economic development services at a contract fee of $130,000.

A majority of councillors also voted against a second rescission motion to overturn a decision to provide the DCDC with audio recordings of past council meetings.

In a sedate meeting of the council and which Cr Reynolds was unable to attend, Cr Shields acknowledged he was fighting a “losing battle”.

Nevertheless he urged his counterparts not to think of the DCDC as a “sacred cow” and said a number of questions about the corporation were unanswered.

He also said that advice from the NSW Government, which prompted the matter to come before the council, showed that they were “not happy” with the council.

“Our solution is to give them $130,000 as a stopgap - clearly that is not with the spirit of what the Department of Local Government said,” he said.

He also acknowledged that the purpose of the rescission motion was to seek advice from “organisations and individuals”.

With the rescission motion defeated after only attracting the votes of Crs Shields and Barnard, Dubbo mayor Allan Smith was able to claim the outcome was not just the one he wanted, but also “the outcome the council wanted”.

But he was quick to point out the vote only guaranteed the interim arrangement.

The successful motion has 12 points and includes changed key performance indicators, severing the representative links between the council and the DCDC, firm reporting requirements and more.

“The resolution makes it clear we have to work through issues of economic development,” Cr Smith said.

“(During the six months) we as councillors will have to work hard.”

That work will include deciding between an internal or external model of economic development.

If the external model is chosen, councillors would then have to develop a tender to operate with all the necessary rules, Cr Smith said.

“(It has to be) pretty stringent, it does not guarantee one organisation a result, they will be up against whoever tenders,” he said.

“The work is just beginning ... and I hope the co-operation is there.

The DCDC will also receive audio copies of the April and May meetings, after the council resolved eight to two that it could not refuse the request.

faye.wheeler@ruralpres s.com

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Interesting view from Ben Shields. Wasn't he on the Grow Dubbo board? Why didn't he get ALL the answeres he needed then? Did he not attend? Did he not participate? Was Tina Reynolds a former Board member of the DCDC? Why are they asking all the questions about what they do when they have both been involved? I for one am seriously beginning to wonder at their purpose for being on council. To muck rack or do some good? Question to the mayor "With all the talk of money wasting how much do all these recision motions cost council in time and money?" I would like an answer to that please
Posted by Concerned Chamber Member, 7/11/2009 7:14:55 AM, on Dubbo Daily Liberal
Good on Ben Shields for having a go.

There are too many issues regarding the DCDC that need anwsering.

The whole "confidentiality" thing does not do anything for me.

Most people in Dubbo think the organisation should be shut down.

Posted by Jem, 7/11/2009 9:56:13 AM, on Dubbo Daily Liberal
Does Dubbo have the dumbest council or what? After all the chaos that this organisation has caused, including this http://www.smh.com.au/national/fi shy-business-in-the-heart-of-dubb o-20090724-dw6e.html the Dubbo Councillors bar 3 have voted to give them more money. This council would have to be the worst in the history of the city.
Posted by saveourcity, 8/11/2009 2:56:56 AM, on Dubbo Daily Liberal
No surprise here. What a waste of ratepayers' money.
Posted by John Q, 8/11/2009 8:43:57 PM, on Dubbo Daily Liberal
What do we try to teach our children, you learn by your mistakes.

Why can't Council remember what they were told when they were growing up.

It seems like Council is itching on spending money.

There are plenty of other projects that need funding from Council that are a priority.

When is council ever going to learn from their mistakes ...

Posted by mia, 8/11/2009 10:17:55 PM, on Dubbo Daily Liberal
each recision motion costs about $4thousand dollars im told an as for money saving i dont think theres a lot of thought put into that by some councillors
Posted by your joking, 9/11/2009 12:08:58 AM, on Dubbo Daily Liberal
Concerned Chamber Member, yes I was on the board of DCDC not Grow Dubbo. When I was on the board I raised the same concerns I have now in writing to the chairperon Mrs Alderdice. Having been on the board and seeing what really goes on, I can tell you this is the the biggest waste of rate payer money I have ever seen. Can you as a chamber member tell me 1 thing that the DCDC/Grow Dubbo has done for this city?. I notice that you write a lot of comments on this site without really knowing facts, would you like to have a meeting so you learn facts from fiction.
Posted by Tina, 9/11/2009 6:02:41 AM, on Dubbo Daily Liberal
Thiis is totally wrong, I have lived here for around 4 years. I have not seen this organisation recieve anything, so 6 months without economic development for the city until council made a decission would be nothing. Thankyou to the 3 Councillors that truely have Dubbo's best interest at heart. The other 8 need to be sacked. What a waste of the rate payers money. Can I suggest that people that are as unhappy as I am to write to the shadow minster for local government ,it is quite clear the minster of local government is not to concern about the waste of rate payers money.
Posted by Jonathon B, 9/11/2009 7:53:36 AM, on Dubbo Daily Liberal
3 Things to say: 1 This is wrong. 2 Rate payers money is being wasted. 3. 8 Councilors need to go.
Posted by Leanne, 9/11/2009 8:35:24 AM, on Dubbo Daily Liberal
3 things to say: 1. Democratic process. 2: Three Councillors need realise they're in the vast minority, get over it and move on. 3: All Councillors should stop wasting apparently $4000 a pop on futile recission motions everytime you're outvoted.
Posted by Smithy, 9/11/2009 3:53:14 PM, on Dubbo Daily Liberal
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Councillors last night decided that the Dubbo City Development Corporation would be funded for the next six months by council.
Councillors last night decided that the Dubbo City Development Corporation would be funded for the next six months by council.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Do you agree with council’s decision to fund the DCDC?

Yes
(12.6%)

No
(87.4%)

Total Votes: 207
Poll Date: 06 November, 2009

Most popular articles

1) Apple iPhone 4 32GB44 plans 12%
2) Apple iPhone 4 16GB44 plans 6%
3) HTC Desire4 plans 2%
4) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB33 plans 2%
5) Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro37 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press

Buy Local


Daily Liberal







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...