News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Change may see Dubbo benefit at expense of smaller facilities 

Change may see Dubbo benefit at expense of smaller facilities

06 Mar, 2010 10:54 AM
Dubbo Base Hospital could be improved under the Federal Government’s planned reforms to fund 60 per cent of health provision, but it would be at the cost of smaller outlying hospitals, according to Parkes MP Mark Coulton.

Yesterday the Daily Telegraph published a list of smaller hospitals it claimed were at risk under the pay-per-service model.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd refuted the claims, but Mr Coulton said if the report was true, it “may not actually be a bad thing for Dubbo Base Hospital”.

“Dubbo could do okay at the expense of the smaller ones - but no one wants that,” he said.

“I’ve been to Bourke this week and no one wants to travel to Dubbo base to have a broken arm fixed.

“We need clarification on this.

Dubbo MP Dawn Fardell has slammed the list of hospitals as an exercise in scaremongering.

“Anyone can pull together a list of country hospitals,” she said.

“I’m not sure what that proves, except to build anxiety levels within rural and regional areas.

“Keep in mind that this is not happening tomorrow. The Rudd Government would need to be elected twice more before this occurs.

And she said while she supported a “bigger role for the Federal Government” in health delivery, she warned against a “one-system-fits-all” approach to hospital funding.

“We certainly can’t accept any model which suggests that the approach applied to a major Sydney hospital is suitable for Parkes, Forbes or Dubbo,” Ms Fardell said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
How gratifying to the citizens of Bourke (those few left) to have Chicken Licken waddling to the rescue. How many times has he been to Bourke as part of his three year National Party junket prior to this week? Dying communities like Bourke are going to have to come to the realisation that with an ageing population the Australian taxpayer will not be able to subsidise their ghost towns with metropolitan standard services. If they want to remain where they are, substandard services will be part of the sacrifice they'll have to make.
Posted by Master Gaga, 6/03/2010 8:42:35 AM, on Dubbo Daily Liberal
I have to agree with Ms Fardell. The Sydney tabloid and Mr Coulton appear to be engaged in spitting out hyperbole. Does Mr Coulton have a short memory? The Nats/Libs had 11 years to sort out the mess and provide meaningful alternatives, instead they arguably made it worse.
Posted by PR, 6/03/2010 11:13:57 AM, on Dubbo Daily Liberal
The most telling comment by Ms Fardell was "Keep in mind that this is not happening tomorrow. The Rudd government would need to be elected twice more before this occurs". Exactly, which tells me that the whole thing is politically motivated to get the heat out of the "Home Insulation" debacle and failed Minister Garrett. Why, I ask, must Mr Rudd have the agreement of the State Premiers within the next five weeks?

Maybe the Coalition did fall short of making significant improvements, but can you imagine the Rudd Government administering the system? They have cost countless jobs, overseen shoddy installers with disasterous outcomes in their haste to gain political advantage in the way they administered what should have been a relatively simple "Stimulus package" program. Again, PM Rudd is saying a lot about another scheme which has more holes in it than a Swiss cheese.

Posted by Tony Ryan, 7/03/2010 11:28:08 AM, on Dubbo Daily Liberal
Health has been the preserve of Labor State Governments for well over 10 years. People like PR are disingenuously pointing blame onto the Federal Government. Sheer nonsense. Rudd told the electorate that Labor had a solution. It is patently obvious he didn't. And listen to "independent" Dawn Fardell singing for her Labor masters.
Posted by andy, 8/03/2010 9:11:32 AM, on Dubbo Daily Liberal

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles


Buy Local


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...